by Shantel Lipp Shantel Lipp

KZENON/123rf

As we welcome in the new year, now is a good time to reflect on the events and progress of 2022, and delve into what we can expect moving into 2023. 

I am watching two developments that I expect will soon be clarified. The first is project carryovers. I’ll be watching to see what impact they will have on the 2023–24 budget. You may recall that, much to my disappointment, last year’s budget did not include money for new projects. The province reported it was dedicating $453 million in the budget to capital projects, but virtually all the work available from the ministry had already been tendered before the spring tender was out.

Last year, numerous projects were completed for the Ministry of Highways, including paving work on Highway 1 west of Moose, Highway 6 south of Naicam and Highway 37 in the Shaunavon and Gull Lake area. Passing lane projects on Highways 7, 12 and part of 16 also wrapped up. There were also many resurfacing projects, including ones near North Battleford on Highway 4 and west of Humboldt on Highway 5 as well as south of Kindersley, on Highway 21. The fall tender was slightly smaller than is typical, but we understand the ministry will be releasing schedules throughout the winter – projects such as small span bridges, crushing and hauling and trapline jobs in preparation for the spring.

Meanwhile, there are highway construction projects continuing. Through the winter, some work can be done, including hauling heavy materials in preparation for next season. As that work moves ahead, I will maintain my relationship with Highways Minister Jeremy Cockrill, making the case that Saskatchewan must continue to spend on its infrastructure to continue its economic momentum and encourage investment in this province. I will also look to gain information from the ministry to share with members. 

The Saskatchewan First Act was introduced in November of last year to assert the province’s legislative jurisdiction over exploration for non-renewable natural resources as well as developing, conserving and managing non-renewable natural and forestry resources and operating sites and facilities for generating and producing electricity.


Saskatchewan’s historic legislation 

The second development I am monitoring is what the provincial government called “historic legislation.” The Saskatchewan First Act was introduced in November of last year to assert the province’s legislative jurisdiction over exploration for non-renewable natural resources as well as developing, conserving and managing non-renewable natural and forestry resources and operating sites and facilities for generating and producing electricity. 

This legislation will also create an Economic Impact Assessment Tribunal, its purpose for “conducting economic impact assessments in relation to federal initiatives.” The members of the tribunal will be appointed by the Lieutenant Governor, who will refer them any federal initiative that could cause economic harm to Saskatchewan. 

The tribunal will also complete an assessment and report its findings and recommendations to the minister. Those recommendations could be about the nature of the economic impact on projects, operations, activities, industries, businesses and residents in the province. It could also include steps to minimize unintended consequences. 

While there has been plenty of discussion about friction in the relationship between the provincial and federal governments around policies such as the carbon tax, The Saskatchewan First Act is still new and many are in the process of reviewing it, including me. 

You may recall a white paper, Drawing the Line: Defending Saskatchewan’s Economic Autonomy, being released in October of 2022, which provides some insight into the government’s introduction of this legislation. In that paper, it is stated that the Government of Saskatchewan is exploring all its options and has an objective to protect this province’s economic future so that natural resources can continue to be extracted and developed responsibly, trade corridors can be expanded to provide the world what it needs and the residents and businesses are protected from “harmful” federal policies. 

SHCA has an interest in this province’s trade corridors and continues to discuss this matter with the provincial government. I am interested to see how this legislation and these objectives could impact our members. I would also be interested to know what you think of this white paper and this new legislation.